Designing Better Libraries logo

Main menu:

Recent Comments

  • Debbie Green: I wonder how appropriate it is for us to feel we can teach researchers how to teach if they are...
  • StevenB: The challenge of which you speak is, I expect, a challenge beyond what might be accomplished with a change...
  • Richard: It’s more worrying to me that there are professors at all our institutions who are teaching students...
  • Garrett: An exquisitely framed approach to a common problem. Brilliant. As opposed to “you can do this”...
  • StevenB: Perhaps some do. I know of faculty who worked in shared offices who were productive researchers and got...

Recent Trackbacks

Blogroll

Search

Pages

Categories

Archives

Meta

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
Designing Better Libraries by steven j bell is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The Age Of The User Experience – Part One

In case you didn’t know it we are now in the Age of the User Experience. As a result, we will all be reading and hearing much more about the user experience. It is all the rage in this new age to talk about developing organizations and services that provide great user experiences. But does anyone really know what the heck that means. If you go to a store to buy something and you get what you want without a hassle did you have a good experience? Or does something really different and special have to happen for it to be a good experience? Or do you just have to pay extra money to enjoy a unique atmosphere that is part of the purchase in order to have a true user experience? It reminds me of a Ziggy cartoon in which he is ordering lunch. The sign promoting the daily special lists two items. One is “Chili – $3.95″. The other item is “The Chili Experience – $4.95″. Those cynical about the concept of a user experience might indeed claim it’s nothing more than paying extra money for the same thing with a bit of heighted ambience. And you know what? According to some experts that might be right.

In Brian’s first post he discussed empathetic design and referenced an article in Harvard Business Review on the topic. I found a citation to that article in a book Brian suggested to me titled The Experience Economy. When I first heard the title I thought it must be a new book given the current trend in designing user experiences – which is what the book is primarily about. Turns out it was published in 1999 – way before the current infatuation with user experiences. According to this book a company or service provider “stages an experience whenever they engage the customers, connecting with them in a personal, memorable way.” Disneyworld is not just an entertainment or amusement park; it is a theme park experience. Starbucks does not sell coffee; it offers creative beverages in a unique atmosphere. That’s why consumers will go there and spend considerably more for coffee drinks than they would pay at Dunkin Donuts. What about libraries? Do they offer a user experience? Unfortunately, the vast majority do not. In fact, we are guilty of the greatest sin possible accroding to the book. We have allowed our services to be commoditized.

Commoditization is the other end of the user experience spectrum. There is no differentiation, and all that can be offered is a cheap product or service. The commodity in which we deal is information. Since we have put most of our organizational focus into obtaining information and making it accessible that is the commodity in which we trade. Consumers (or users) do not highly value the product or service, and they would likely be unwilling to pay more to obtain it. It’s likely most users come to our libraries because they have no other choices (college students, for example, cannot obtain many privileges at any other library but their own), and when they do have a choice, such as using a search engine, they typically will often choose that other information provider first. Libraries are no longer the only provider of this commodity, and hence we are losing our users to other providers that offer information that can be accessed more conveniently – if not cheaper. Despite our efforts to promote the quality of our information over the convenience of our competitors, it has failed to convince users to alter their information seeking behavior. You might argue that libraries also provide services, such as reference or interlibrary loan. But where we fail is in customizing our services to the needs of the individual.

Is it even possible for libraries to offer a user experience? Can we make using the library a memorable experience? Can we do for finding information and conducting research what Starbucks does for coffee? While we can’t have fireworks exploding everytime someone borrows a book  – that would certainly make for a memorable experience – there may be ways that we can do more to create a better user experience for a library user. Whatever that may be I believe it is going to differ somewhat from library to library, as the user experience could be customized to local needs and desires. Perhaps, initially, libraries need to concentrate on making sure things work well. Presently, too many libraries have too many things that are, quite simply, broken. We will be doing more exploration of the user experience concept here at DBL. We may yet discover practical, affordable, and user grabbing ways to, as the Experience Economy suggests, “ING the THING” – what is known as “experientializing” the commodity. Securing our relevance as we head into the future may depend upon it.

I’ll be writing more about the Age of the User Experience in part two of this post.

 

Comments

Comment from Jill Stover
Posted: February 26, 2007 at 5:33 pm

Along these lines, readers may also be interested in the book, Making Meaning. I’ve only read a part of it, so I can’t give a thorough review, but the Idea Sandbox has a nice summary here: http://www.idea-sandbox.com/blog/2007/02/making_meaning_to_customers_em.html

Some initial thoughts: I think creating a meaningful experience is about creating context. Disney World does a great job of telling a coherent story, which allows people to feel comfortable and to perform the roles they play and interact with the other actors. Without some kind of narrative, my guess is that the Disney experience would be too chaotic to be enjoyed. I think the same is true of libraries. We offer a lot of disjointed activities and services, but don’t package them in a way that helps users make sense of them. This ambiguity can lead to anxiety and avoidance. There’s much in the marketing literature on Role Theory and Script Theory, which may be of use here as well.

I look forward to continuing this discussion!

Pingback from Exploring Models For Academic Libraries
Posted: March 12, 2007 at 9:19 pm

[…] 1. The research library will be special not so much because of the quantity of information it can offer the user but because of the quality of the experience in which that information is presented. (read more on the importance of the “user experience“) […]

Pingback from Designing Better Libraries » Coping With The Features Conundrum
Posted: May 31, 2007 at 11:51 am

[…] Presenting too many features to users is recognized as a problem in the age of the user experience. According to Adreas Pfeiffer in an article titled “Features Don’t Matter Anymore“, what users really want is simplicity, not features. This can be a real challenge for libraries seeking to design a better user experience because many of our resources are feature laden products that ultimately overwhelm and confuse the end user – a definite problem in the age of user experience. […]

Comment from Asako Yoshida
Posted: July 11, 2007 at 11:03 am

This is a wonderful, not one-sided operational concept combining critical thinking and design thinking. You discuss this in the concept of changing and redesigning libraries as institution. I am excited thinking when librarians and teaching faculty can convey transparently the same learning concept to students in their efforts to play their professional roles. It would be wonderful if students can adapt the same kind of concept in their learning and exploration as they interact with us or coming in contact with libraries and librarians.

Pingback from iLibrarian » Happy New Year!
Posted: January 2, 2008 at 12:52 am

[…] In 2007 we discussed what library 2.0 is and isn’t, built Facebook Applications, and learned how to make time to keep up. We were schooled in “unsucking” online education…twice. We entered a new world of librarianship, took a hard look at libraries and the user experience, and developed basic 2.0 competencies. We were given twenty good reasons why learning about emerging tech is part of our job and offered advice about negotiating speaking engagements. Librarians looked at the salary gap, published manifestos, mashed up the library, and much much more. In all, it was an exciting year, here’s to making 2008 just as eventful and innovative! […]

Pingback from Happy New Year! – OEDB.org
Posted: July 16, 2013 at 6:43 pm

[…] online education…twice. We entered a new world of librarianship, took a hard look at libraries and the user experience, and developed basic 2.0 competencies. We were given twenty good reasons why learning about […]

Write a comment